THE CURIOUS CASE OF THE MISSING ARTEFACTS
Released On 29th Aug 2023
As employment lawyers, we've seen our fair share of workplace drama unfold. From the employee that alleged that the plant pot on her desk was discriminatory because it made discussions with colleagues more difficult, to the construction company that deemed that beards were a health risk – we thought we'd seen it all. That is, until we heard about the curious case of the British Museum's missing treasures. Move over Sherlock, we've got a new mystery to solve! 🕵️♂️
So, grab your magnifying glass because today we're delving into the intriguing saga of the former curator turned alleged artefact pilferer, and exploring the legal landscape of employee dismissal.
The Vanishing Valuables
In a plot twist even Agatha Christie would admire, former curator Peter John Higgs found himself in a role he didn't sign up for – the dismissed employee accused of masterminding the theft of millennia-spanning artefacts. Jewellery, gems, and precious metals did a Houdini right out of the museum's archives.
Now, let's be honest – most of these items were tucked away in a storeroom, likely never dreaming of being the centrepiece of a museum heist. But alas, instead of stealing the spotlight, they were allegedly stolen and listed for sale on eBay! If only eBay had a "lost and found" section.
"When Trust is Broken, Investigate..."
Trust, once broken, is harder to mend than Humpty Dumpty. While we can't provide a magic glue for your shattered trust, we can guide you through the proper procedures to handle such sticky situations. “It’s elementary, my dear Watson”!
First things first: investigations. We're not talking about Mulder and Scully here, but rather a thorough digging into the situation. CCTV footage, witness interviews, and possibly even tea leaves (if you're feeling particularly mystical) should all be part of your Sherlock-worthy investigation (just joking about the tea leaves…). And don't forget the "accused" – give them a chance to share their side of the story.
"The Heist, The Myth, The Legal Maze"
So, what's a museum to do when treasures start evaporating like mist in the morning sun? Well, they're taking legal action against our enigmatic former curator. But here's a twist – the sacked employee hasn't been identified as the mastermind behind the grand treasure hunt. In this case, the museum should ensure that the investigation is thorough and, if appropriate, that action is taken against other employees who may also be caught up in the scandal.
The plot thickens as the Metropolitan Police steps in. No arrests yet, but our noble detectives are on the case.
If you find yourself in a situation where employee misconduct is being investigated by the police, ACAS guidance is that you need not wait for their outcome. However, the decision not to wait must be fair and reasonable in the circumstances. If your business can’t afford to be in limbo for a prolonged period, then continuing is justifiable. Remember, just because the police are involved it doesn’t necessarily mean that the allegations are true or credible. Conversely, even if the police investigation comes to nothing you may still be justified in taking disciplinary action.
Case Recommendations and Findings
As the saga unfolds, we're here to remind you that even in the grandest of dramas, employment laws remain constant. Leave the 'whodunnit' for Mr Holmes to solve; as an employer, your focus is on the individuals employed by you and whether there is a case to answer.
Offer a fair hearing, follow your policies and procedures, and give the right of appeal. But remember, the detective who first busted out the magnifying glass shouldn't be the one wearing the judge's robe.
In the end, the heist at the British Museum serves as a valuable lesson – one that reminds us that trust is the true gem of any workplace. Remember, not all that glitters is gold – sometimes it's just a case waiting to be solved.
Want to see past updates?
